But before rushing out to buy one of these flight control systems, you should know their best features: That is why a lot of dedicated gamers of different skill levels and backgrounds love this brand. Moreover, they have the industry experience to back their claims. It is easy to trust Saitek because they manufacture some of the most hardcore controllers for hardcore gamers. Saitek X52 Pro – Features ReviewĪccording to the company’s website, Saitek’s primary emphasis is on developing goods for gamers that are developed by gamers.
#LOGITECH G SAITEK X52 FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM REVIEW MOD#
Moreover, the flight simulation community can help you mod it to make it feel like the pro version. The Saitek X52 non-pro will get your foot in the door of flight simulation. However, we recommend the non-pro variant for beginners. If you are willing to shell out a lot of money, the decision is pretty easy: go for the Pro version. A multifunction LCD provides quick access to an incredible 282 programmable instructions on Saitek’s X52 and X52 Pro flight control systems.
While both Saitek flight control systems have the same number of programmable buttons, only the X52 Pro has programmable LEDs in its buttons. But if we need to choose, the Saitek X52 Pros are better. While the throttle on the X52 Pro is very accurate, the rotary axes on the X52 are also quite precise. Due to a low tension on the stick, the X52 non-pro version felt loose in our tests. The Saitek X52 Pro also trumps the non-pro variant in this category. After all, you pay more with the Pro variant. It has more metal components, which feels more premium. The Saitek X52 Pro has unsurprisingly better materials than its non-pro sibling. On the other hand, the Saitek X52 sports an equal combination of black and silver. It is mainly black in color with some shiny silver accents. In terms of the overall design, the Saitek X52 Pro has a sleeker and more modern design. There are only a handful of features that differentiates one from the other. The Saitek X52 and X52 Pro are nearly identical.
0 kommentar(er)
